As one might expect, the post was light on details - there was no timeframe and no vendors because T-Mobile was 'still in the process of selecting them.'
Then today, Kevin Fitchard at Connected Planet posted that "T-Mobile USA has no plans to offer a femtocell and will continue to focus on its dual-mode Wi-Fi fixed mobile convergence strategy," adding "at least that's what we're hearing from T-Mobile."
I think the answer is clear: a definite maybe.
It's a blog, so let's speculate: Why T-Mobile would want to offer a femtocell:
Everyone else is. ATT, VZW, Sprint all have a femtocell, they don't want to be left out. Undoubtedly there are T-Mobile customers who would be willing to pay for a femtocell to get better coverage at home.
Why T-Mobile wouldn't want to offer a femtocell:
It's not at all clear that people want a femtocell service - especially if they have to pay for it. Of course, some do, but recall that earlier this year the Femto Forum announced that there were 'more femtocells in the US than macro cell towers'. They pegged the number at 350,000 units.
Let's do some math. Between the three largest carriers in the US, servicing some 230,000,000 subscribers, they have managed to sell (or give away) 350,000 femtocells - or about 0.1%. No wonder 2010 was the 'year of the femtocell', or was it 2009, or 2008..., or maybe it will be 2011.
Meanwhile, T-Mobile seems to be rocking the Smart Wi-Fi. It's part of their hottest selling '4G' phones the MyTouch 4G and Google G2. Plus with Wi-Fi installed in an estimated 50,000,000 homes in the US, Smart Wi-Fi has a HUGE head start when it comes to installed base.
1 comment:
3G Wimax & HSPA have failed miserably to meet consumer expectations of broadband. You can blame it to 5Mhz spectrum. But Femto/wifi may be able to rescue carriers of shame to meet some broadband requirements. Here is some analysis
http://4g4you.blogspot.com/2011/02/coexistance-of-wifi-femto-cells.html
Post a Comment